[
  {
    "id": "inbox-priority-review",
    "title": "Triage your inbox without automatically replying",
    "description": "Separate messages needing a decision from reference material and low-priority mail.",
    "category": "Personal operations",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Beginner",
    "evidence": "Vendor example",
    "output": "A source-linked inbox review with action items, deadlines, and unsent reply drafts.",
    "inputs": [
      "A limited date range or mailbox label",
      "Your priority rules and examples of messages that matter"
    ],
    "connections": "Begin with approved exports or pasted source material. Live access requires separately configured integrations and permissions; this guide does not install them.",
    "prompt": "Review [mailbox scope] using [priority rules]. Return messages requiring my decision, deadlines explicitly stated in the email, unanswered questions, and optional unsent reply drafts. Link to the original message and distinguish an explicit commitment from an inference. Do not send, archive, delete, unsubscribe, or change labels. Ask for clarification when the sender's intent is unclear.",
    "steps": [
      "Connect only the mailbox access you intend Muse to use, or provide approved exports.",
      "Define the time range and examples of high-priority messages.",
      "Compare the first brief to the original messages, including excluded items.",
      "Adjust rules and use an approval step for any later actions."
    ],
    "review": "Check deadlines, recipients, commitments, and any message the assistant may have missed.",
    "limits": [
      "Mail access and available actions depend on your configured account.",
      "A large inbox demonstration does not prove reliable triage for every mailbox."
    ],
    "measure": "Missed important messages, false priorities, and corrections to draft replies.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Muse email demonstration",
        "url": "https://x.com/Muse/status/2097440088812662803",
        "author": "Muse, featuring Casey and Hal",
        "note": "September 8, 2026. Official demonstration of working with a large email history. Our priority rubric and draft-only prompt are editorial additions.",
        "kind": "Vendor example"
      },
      {
        "title": "Introducing Muse",
        "url": "https://about.fb.com/news/2026/09/introducing-muse-personal-ai-agent/",
        "author": "Meta",
        "note": "Official introduction of the personal agent. Connector access, account availability, and action permissions still need to be configured.",
        "kind": "Official documentation"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "prospect-research-sheet",
    "title": "Research a small prospect list with evidence",
    "description": "Build account briefs you can verify before using them for outreach.",
    "category": "Business research",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Beginner",
    "evidence": "Practitioner report",
    "output": "A spreadsheet-ready account list with fit evidence, sources, and unsent outreach ideas.",
    "inputs": [
      "Your customer profile and exclusion criteria",
      "A small approved account list or research scope"
    ],
    "connections": "Begin with approved exports or pasted source material. Live access requires separately configured integrations and permissions; this guide does not install them.",
    "prompt": "Research [accounts or bounded search scope] against [customer profile]. Return company name, domain, relevant public facts, dated source URLs, and fit reasoning. Use unknown for missing details. Deduplicate records and separate factual evidence from an outreach hypothesis. Draft an optional short opener only for reviewed accounts. Do not guess private contact information or send messages.",
    "steps": [
      "Specify company-level criteria and excluded categories.",
      "Start with a small research batch that can be manually checked.",
      "Review source URLs and company identity before exporting results.",
      "Have the owner approve any outreach and separately verify contact details."
    ],
    "review": "Check company matches, source dates, fit reasoning, and every personalized claim before use.",
    "limits": [
      "The creator\u2019s CSV report does not prove research completeness.",
      "Website access or third-party enrichment may require separate tools and subscriptions."
    ],
    "measure": "Verified fields, duplicate records, and reviewer-accepted account briefs.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Prospect research with Muse",
        "url": "https://x.com/smallchris/status/2098373287453601935",
        "author": "Chris Small",
        "note": "September 11, 2026. Reports account research, CSV enrichment, and outreach drafts. The public excerpt does not establish completeness or accuracy.",
        "kind": "Practitioner report"
      },
      {
        "title": "Introducing Muse",
        "url": "https://about.fb.com/news/2026/09/introducing-muse-personal-ai-agent/",
        "author": "Meta",
        "note": "Official introduction of the personal agent. Connector access, account availability, and action permissions still need to be configured.",
        "kind": "Official documentation"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "morning-operations-brief",
    "title": "Prepare a morning business operations brief",
    "description": "Bring approved order, email, and task updates into one reviewable agenda.",
    "category": "Business operations",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Intermediate",
    "evidence": "Practitioner report",
    "output": "A read-only briefing with exceptions, deadlines, owner questions, and links to source records.",
    "inputs": [
      "Approved order, email, and task summaries",
      "Your operating priorities and escalation thresholds"
    ],
    "connections": "Begin with approved exports or pasted source material. Live access requires separately configured integrations and permissions; this guide does not install them.",
    "prompt": "Create a morning brief from [approved business sources] for [date and time zone]. Identify exceptions, overdue tasks, explicit customer commitments, and owner decisions. Include a source link or record ID for each item. Separate observed facts from suggested priorities. Do not change orders, assign employees, message customers, or update tasks. Flag conflicting records and unavailable sources.",
    "steps": [
      "Identify the systems and data you want in the briefing.",
      "Use exports first; configure supported connections only after checking permissions.",
      "Verify the brief against source records and inspect any missing source warnings.",
      "Let the operator make decisions and record actions in the original systems."
    ],
    "review": "The owner checks deadlines, order status, customer commitments, and whether all required sources were available.",
    "limits": [
      "The source post does not establish a specific native connector.",
      "A read-only brief can become stale after another employee updates a record."
    ],
    "measure": "Important exceptions missed, stale facts, and review time.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Muse across business operations",
        "url": "https://x.com/williamgeronco/status/2099816178071835132",
        "author": "William Geronco",
        "note": "September 15, 2026. Reports using Muse across store, email, employee, and task workflows. Exact integrations and audited outcomes are not given.",
        "kind": "Practitioner report"
      },
      {
        "title": "Introducing Muse",
        "url": "https://about.fb.com/news/2026/09/introducing-muse-personal-ai-agent/",
        "author": "Meta",
        "note": "Official introduction of the personal agent. Connector access, account availability, and action permissions still need to be configured.",
        "kind": "Official documentation"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "airport-hotel-shortlist",
    "title": "Research an airport hotel during a travel disruption",
    "description": "Compare usable options with terminal access, check-in rules, and total cost visible.",
    "category": "Travel research",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Beginner",
    "evidence": "Practitioner report",
    "output": "A dated shortlist with location, access constraints, availability links, and questions to verify.",
    "inputs": [
      "Airport, terminal, dates, arrival time, and party details",
      "Budget, mobility requirements, and cancellation preferences"
    ],
    "connections": "Begin with approved exports or pasted source material. Live access requires separately configured integrations and permissions; this guide does not install them.",
    "prompt": "Research hotel options for [airport and terminal] on [dates] within [budget]. Compare terminal access, airside or landside requirements, transfer options, check-in hours, total quoted price and currency, and cancellation terms. Cite official sources and the time checked. Mark availability unconfirmed until verified in the booking flow. Do not submit forms, book, or pay. Flag any transit or entry question for me to resolve.",
    "steps": [
      "Write down arrival time, terminal, and access constraints.",
      "Research official hotel pages and current booking terms.",
      "Verify that the traveler can reach the property and check in at the required time.",
      "Present a short comparison and let the traveler complete the purchase."
    ],
    "review": "Verify live price, currency, airport access, transport hours, cancellation rules, and the exact dates.",
    "limits": [
      "Availability can change between research and checkout.",
      "The guide cannot determine a traveler\u2019s immigration or transit eligibility."
    ],
    "measure": "Options with all required details verified and unsuitable listings excluded.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Airport hotel research during disruption",
        "url": "https://x.com/deep4rk/status/2099691448505336298",
        "author": "AGI son / @deep4rk",
        "note": "September 15, 2026. Reports hotel research and a prefilled booking form during travel disruption. One personal anecdote; this guide stops before purchase.",
        "kind": "Practitioner report"
      },
      {
        "title": "Introducing Muse",
        "url": "https://about.fb.com/news/2026/09/introducing-muse-personal-ai-agent/",
        "author": "Meta",
        "note": "Official introduction of the personal agent. Connector access, account availability, and action permissions still need to be configured.",
        "kind": "Official documentation"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "contractor-estimate-prep",
    "title": "Prepare contractor calls and estimate requests",
    "description": "Turn a repair description into a consistent brief you can send to several providers.",
    "category": "Property tasks",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Intermediate",
    "evidence": "Practitioner report",
    "output": "A scope brief, call script, provider shortlist, and quote-comparison template.",
    "inputs": [
      "A clear repair description and approved photos",
      "Location, access constraints, and preferred schedule"
    ],
    "connections": "Begin with approved exports or pasted source material. Live access requires separately configured integrations and permissions; this guide does not install them.",
    "prompt": "Prepare an estimate-request pack for [repair] at [general location]. Summarize the supplied scope without diagnosing beyond the evidence. List clarification questions, information each provider should quote, and an appointment script. Research candidate businesses with official source links. Do not call, send photos, disclose a full address, accept an estimate, or book a visit without my specific approval.",
    "steps": [
      "Clarify what is known, what is uncertain, and which photos can be shared.",
      "Prepare one scope brief to make provider responses comparable.",
      "Verify provider details and review the call script or draft message.",
      "Use approved communication manually, or a calling feature only if available and authorized."
    ],
    "review": "The owner checks scope, provider credentials, address disclosure, access arrangements, and the quote details.",
    "limits": [
      "The source uses a beta calling capability that may not be available in your account.",
      "An AI-prepared brief is not a professional diagnosis or proof a contractor is qualified."
    ],
    "measure": "Complete comparable responses and clarification rounds required.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Contractor calls with Muse",
        "url": "https://x.com/ZachSB/status/2099611141936742765",
        "author": "Zach Solomon",
        "note": "September 14, 2026. Reports beta calling and follow-up email. Calling access is not assumed; this guide also works as a preparation-only workflow.",
        "kind": "Practitioner report"
      },
      {
        "title": "Introducing Muse",
        "url": "https://about.fb.com/news/2026/09/introducing-muse-personal-ai-agent/",
        "author": "Meta",
        "note": "Official introduction of the personal agent. Connector access, account availability, and action permissions still need to be configured.",
        "kind": "Official documentation"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "supplier-comparison",
    "title": "Compare suppliers for a hardware bill of materials",
    "description": "A component sourcing table with exact part identifiers, supplier URLs, stock, quantity, cost and unresolved substitutions.",
    "category": "Business operations",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Intermediate",
    "evidence": "Practitioner report",
    "output": "A component sourcing table with exact part identifiers, supplier URLs, stock, quantity, cost and unresolved substitutions.",
    "inputs": [
      "Bill of materials with exact part identifiers and required quantities",
      "Approved suppliers, delivery destination, budget, and deadline"
    ],
    "connections": "User-provided bill of materials and approved supplier websites; procurement and payments require explicit approval.",
    "prompt": "Research [bill of materials] against [approved suppliers and requirements]. For each line, list exact manufacturer and part number, supplier URL, quantity available, unit and extended cost, shipping and tax assumptions, lead time, and return terms. Separate exact matches from proposed substitutes and flag unclear specifications. Reconcile quoted quantities to the original list. Do not create supplier accounts, disclose confidential design details, place orders, or make payments. Return a sourcing table and unresolved questions for approval.",
    "steps": [
      "Normalize part identifiers, specifications, and quantities in the bill of materials.",
      "Find exact supplier matches and record time-sensitive stock and prices.",
      "Compare landed cost assumptions, lead times, and any proposed substitutions.",
      "Have the project owner review compatibility and approve procurement separately."
    ],
    "review": "A technically qualified owner verifies component compatibility, authenticity, stock, quantities, and shipping constraints.",
    "limits": [
      "The visible X excerpt reports research and procurement across 14 suppliers but is truncated. Do not claim transaction verification details or achieved time savings without the full source. This is a personal report, not a reproduced test.",
      "The prompt, setup steps, and review criteria are editorial adaptations; this directory has not reproduced the reported outcome."
    ],
    "measure": "Exact matches sourced, uncertain substitutes identified, and missing or duplicated line items.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Compare suppliers for a hardware bill of materials \u2014 original X report",
        "url": "https://x.com/justinbojarski/status/2099630878993387556",
        "author": "Bojo.io",
        "note": "2026-09-14. Verified original author and public excerpt via X oEmbed on 2026-10-12. The visible X excerpt reports research and procurement across 14 suppliers but is truncated. Do not claim transaction verification details or achieved time savings without the full source. This is a personal report, not a reproduced test. Guide prompt and steps are editorial additions.",
        "kind": "Practitioner report"
      }
    ],
    "reviewed": "2026-10-12"
  },
  {
    "id": "todo-sync-plan",
    "title": "Design a reviewed sync between your task app and Muse",
    "description": "A task-sync mapping and dry-run change report with conflict rules and stable task identifiers.",
    "category": "Personal operations",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Intermediate",
    "evidence": "Practitioner report",
    "output": "A task-sync mapping and dry-run change report with conflict rules and stable task identifiers.",
    "inputs": [
      "A task export or documented authorized access to the chosen task app",
      "Field mapping, source-of-truth choice, and conflict-resolution rules"
    ],
    "connections": "A task app with supported exports or documented authorized integration. The post reports custom syncing for an app without an official API; do not imply an official native connector.",
    "prompt": "Design a sync between [task app] and [approved Muse task context]. Use only documented interfaces or approved exports. First produce a dry-run mapping of task IDs, title, status, due date, time zone, and last-modified timestamp. Explain conflicts and duplicates; preserve originals. Do not bypass app controls, use undocumented private endpoints, delete tasks, or write any changes yet. If supported access is unavailable, provide an export/import review process instead.",
    "steps": [
      "Confirm supported access and back up the existing task list.",
      "Choose the source of truth and define status, date, and conflict rules.",
      "Run a read-only comparison on a small sample and review every proposed change.",
      "Approve limited writes only after the sample reconciles; retain a rollback copy."
    ],
    "review": "Check stable IDs, duplicate handling, time zones, recurring tasks, conflict resolution, and recovery from partial sync.",
    "limits": [
      "Custom practitioner setup; the excerpt does not reveal implementation details or establish reliability across all Apple devices. Avoid presenting this as a universally supported one-click integration.",
      "The prompt, setup steps, and review criteria are editorial adaptations; this directory has not reproduced the reported outcome."
    ],
    "measure": "Matched tasks, duplicate creations, unresolved conflicts, and changes that need correction.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Design a reviewed sync between your task app and Muse \u2014 original X report",
        "url": "https://x.com/holman/status/2099588794689437736",
        "author": "Zach Holman",
        "note": "2026-09-14. Verified original author and public excerpt via X oEmbed on 2026-10-12. Custom practitioner setup; the excerpt does not reveal implementation details or establish reliability across all Apple devices. Avoid presenting this as a universally supported one-click integration. Guide prompt and steps are editorial additions.",
        "kind": "Practitioner report"
      }
    ],
    "reviewed": "2026-10-12"
  },
  {
    "id": "flexible-flight-matrix",
    "title": "Compare flexible travel dates and arrival cities",
    "description": "A dated flight matrix comparing route, dates, baggage, duration, cash price, points and taxes.",
    "category": "Travel research",
    "tool": "Muse",
    "toolUrl": "https://muse.ai/",
    "level": "Intermediate",
    "evidence": "Practitioner report",
    "output": "A dated flight matrix comparing route, dates, baggage, duration, cash price, points and taxes.",
    "inputs": [
      "Departure airport, acceptable destinations, date flexibility, and travelers",
      "Baggage, layover, arrival-time preferences, cash budget, and optionally points balances"
    ],
    "connections": "Current airline and booking sources; award inventory may need authorized loyalty account access. No booking or transfer of points without approval.",
    "prompt": "Compare flights for [bounded airports and date range] under [travel requirements]. Create a dated matrix with route, departure and arrival times, stops, duration, baggage, fare restrictions, cash total, and points plus taxes where available. Keep award and cash prices separate unless I supply a points valuation. Cite current airline or booking sources and label unavailable inventory. Recommend a shortlist based on the stated tradeoffs. Do not book, transfer points, or enter traveler or payment details.",
    "steps": [
      "Limit the airport and date combinations and record non-negotiable travel requirements.",
      "Collect comparable current cash and available award fares.",
      "Compare baggage, layovers, duration, fare restrictions, and total costs.",
      "Recheck the shortlist directly with the airline before the user approves booking."
    ],
    "review": "Confirm dates, airport identity, separate-ticket connections, baggage, final price, award availability, and change rules.",
    "limits": [
      "The author reports 146 searches across Spain/Italy routes and seven dates. Search count and optimization are self-reported; no fare guarantee or independently verified best price.",
      "The prompt, setup steps, and review criteria are editorial adaptations; this directory has not reproduced the reported outcome."
    ],
    "measure": "Usable route/date combinations verified and incomplete or misleading comparisons excluded.",
    "sources": [
      {
        "title": "Compare flexible travel dates and arrival cities \u2014 original X report",
        "url": "https://x.com/mehtadeep/status/2099498596789850192",
        "author": "Deep Mehta",
        "note": "2026-09-14. Verified original author and public excerpt via X oEmbed on 2026-10-12. The author reports 146 searches across Spain/Italy routes and seven dates. Search count and optimization are self-reported; no fare guarantee or independently verified best price. Guide prompt and steps are editorial additions.",
        "kind": "Practitioner report"
      }
    ],
    "reviewed": "2026-10-12"
  }
]